PacketViper’s Cyber-Physical
Security Capabilities Whitepaper
PacketViper takes an integrated approach to CPS security by bridging
physical and digital domains under one autonomous system. It monitors physical
access and environmental factors (e.g. motion, temperature,
humidity) via integrated sensors, feeding this data into its security platform
for 360° visibility[1]. Anomalies in the physical environment (such as unauthorized door
openings or abnormal room temperature) can be correlated with network events in
real time, providing comprehensive situational awareness. This tight cyber-physical
correlation means that PacketViper can detect and respond to threats faster
– for example, a tripped motion sensor in a server closet combined with unusual
network scans will trigger instant alerts and defensive actions[2] .
On the cyber side, PacketViper autonomously controls digital network
access through in-line deception and automated enforcement. It deploys
active decoys and micro-perimeter segmentation at critical points to
contain threats immediately without waiting for human intervention or complex
orchestration[3][4]. Suspicious traffic (e.g. malware or an unauthorized device) is
automatically engaged by PacketViper’s decoys and then blocked in real time –
effectively neutralizing attacks at “wire speed.” This autonomous threat
remediation is built into the platform’s design, allowing it to isolate and
stop malicious activity on OT networks while legitimate operations continue
unaffected[3]. By enforcing Zero Trust principles (only allowing expected
communications and nothing else), PacketViper prevents lateral movement, even
for stealthy threats that breach the perimeter[4] .
Critically, PacketViper is designed to operate in distributed,
unmanaged, or air-gapped locations typical of CPS environments. Its
architecture distributes intelligence out to Remote Security Units (RSUs) that
can function independently at remote sites such as traffic control cabinets,
building automation closets, or far-flung utility stations. Each unit provides
local monitoring and defense without requiring constant connectivity to a
central hub[5]. This means PacketViper can secure unattended infrastructure –
maintaining segmented, secure communications even in air-gapped or isolated
networks[6] . The platform’s orchestration-free autonomy is ideal for
critical systems in remote or rugged locations: for example, a PacketViper
appliance in a highway traffic controller or pipeline pump station will
continue enforcing policy and deploying decoys on-site, even if the backhaul
network is down. In short, PacketViper integrates physical sensor data, cyber
deception, and self-contained enforcement to protect CPS in real time, wherever
they are deployed.
The Cyber-Physical Systems market is large and rapidly growing,
reflecting the convergence of operational technology with IT. In 2024, the
global CPS market is estimated around \$118 billion, with analysts
projecting robust double-digit growth (~13–15% CAGR) in the coming years[7] . This growth is driven by several key factors:
Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing: The
push for automation and data-driven operations in industry (Industry 4.0)
is a major catalyst for CPS adoption[8] . Manufacturers are deploying CPS to enable real-time coordination
between machines and digital systems, improving efficiency and enabling
predictive maintenance and autonomous production lines. These “smart
factory” initiatives rely on CPS technologies to tightly integrate
sensors, robotics, and control systems on the shop floor.
Smart Infrastructure & Cities:
Governments and enterprises are investing heavily in smart infrastructure
(smart grids, intelligent transportation systems, smart buildings, etc.),
which in turn drives the CPS market[9]. Urban initiatives use CPS to link digital intelligence with
physical infrastructure – for example, optimizing traffic flow through
connected traffic lights, reducing energy waste in power grids, and
automating building climate or security controls. The rise of these
projects around the world is expanding CPS deployment in transportation,
utilities, and city services[9] .
Rising Cyber-Physical Risks: As more
critical processes become digitized and connected, there is greater
awareness of the cyber-physical risk – the potential for cyber
attacks to cause real-world physical disruption or safety incidents.
High-profile events in recent years have underscored this danger: for
instance, the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack in 2021 forced a
shutdown of fuel distribution, and the Oldsmar water treatment breach
showed an attacker attempting to alter chemical controls[10][11]. These incidents highlight that cyber threats can quickly
translate into physical consequences. In response, regulators and industry
standards are pressuring organizations to bolster CPS security. Frameworks
like NERC CIP (for electric utilities) and new guidelines from agencies
like CISA specifically call for internal segmentation and protections to
address these cyber-physical threats[12] . The result is that security for CPS and industrial control
systems has become a board-level priority in many sectors.
CPS vs IoT – Closed-Loop Control: It’s
important to distinguish true Cyber-Physical Systems from the broader
Internet of Things (IoT). While IoT generally refers to networks of connected
devices exchanging data (often for monitoring or convenience), CPS are
characterized by real-time, closed-loop control of physical processes[13]. In a CPS, embedded computers don’t just send data to the cloud – they
actively monitor sensor readings and then adjust or control physical equipment
based on that feedback. For example, an autonomous manufacturing cell or a
self-driving car forms a CPS: sensors feed into algorithms that immediately
drive actuators. IoT devices (like a smart thermostat or a wearable sensor)
typically lack this direct automated control loop. This distinction matters for
security. Protecting CPS means safeguarding systems that could
autonomously change the physical world – failures can have safety implications.
Thus, CPS security demands not only network protection, but assurance that feedback
loops cannot be maliciously manipulated. PacketViper’s approach, with its
focus on both the physical signals and digital commands, is tailored for this
reality, whereas many IoT security tools may only address device connectivity
and data concerns[13] .
In the emerging CPS protection space, several vendors offer solutions
that address parts of the problem. Below is a brief comparison of PacketViper
with a few notable players, highlighting differing philosophies and
capabilities:
Siemens (SIBERprotect): Siemens’s
SIBERprotect is a PLC-based real-time cyber-physical defense
system. It extends the concept of SOAR (Security Orchestration,
Automation, Response) into industrial control by sending alerts directly
to a PLC for instant protective action[14]. In practice, SIBERprotect can isolate and quarantine infected
industrial equipment within milliseconds of a threat being detected[15]. This rapid response at the automation layer (using S7-1500 PLC
controllers) allows it to contain malware or attacks before they spread,
effectively acting as a “cyber safety system” tied into the control
hardware. SIBERprotect’s strength is leveraging Siemens’ deep integration
with control systems to initiate physical responses (e.g. shutting
down a process or switching networks) immediately based on threat
intelligence. It excels at real-time containment in environments that use
Siemens gear, though its focus is on automatic isolation of
incidents rather than deceptive prevention. Siemens positions SIBERprotect
as part of a defense-in-depth strategy compliant with IEC‑62443 standards
for industrial cybersecurity[16] .
Honeywell: Honeywell, as a leading
industrial automation vendor, provides OT cybersecurity solutions that
emphasize protecting the physical process and operational
continuity. Their approach leverages deep domain expertise in industries
like energy, chemicals, and manufacturing. Honeywell’s solutions (e.g.
Honeywell Forge Cybersecurity and various services) focus on real-time
OT network visibility, anomaly detection, and safety integration[17]. They highlight the need to monitor industrial process variables
alongside traditional cyber indicators to detect cyber-physical attack
phases. For example, Honeywell’s systems can observe if a process setpoint
is suddenly changed outside normal parameters, correlating that with
network alerts to catch an attack in progress. Honeywell also offers
secured USB media scanning (SMX) and OT-focused security operations
centers, reflecting a holistic approach to reducing operational risk[17] . In short, Honeywell’s strength lies in marrying cybersecurity
with process safety – providing governance, compliance, and managed
services that help protect the actual physical operations of
industrial sites. Their offerings are often service-heavy and integrated
with Honeywell control systems, aimed at organizations that need to
improve OT security posture without compromising reliability.
Armis: Armis delivers an agentless,
real-time visibility platform widely used for enterprise IoT and OT
environments. In the CPS context, Armis acts as a passive monitoring
system that discovers every device on the network and continuously watches
for anomalous behavior or threats[18]. It is cloud-based and aggregates data to detect things like
unauthorized devices, strange traffic patterns, or known attack signatures
in real time. Armis is especially known for its extensive device
knowledgebase (covering IT, IoT, and industrial devices) and its ability
to identify assets and risks without installing any software on endpoints.
When it comes to enforcement, Armis typically integrates with existing
network infrastructure (such as NAC solutions or firewalls) to quarantine
or segment devices as needed. Its core value is CPS threat detection
and visibility – giving security teams a live map of everything
happening in their OT network and alerting on suspicious events[18] . Compared to PacketViper, Armis provides rich detection and asset
intelligence, but it relies on alerting and integrated partner tools for
response (often a human or separate system must take action on Armis
alerts). In essence, Armis excels at painting a detailed picture of the
CPS environment and spotting threats, whereas PacketViper goes further by
automatically defending in-line once a threat is spotted.
Claroty: Claroty is often cited as a
leading platform for OT asset governance, risk management, and
visibility. Its flagship products focus on deep asset discovery
(inventories of PLCs, RTUs, etc.), continuous network monitoring,
vulnerability assessment, and simplified secure remote access to OT
systems[19]. Claroty’s strength lies in providing a comprehensive view of all
OT assets and their communications – it can map out network connections,
identify misconfigurations or vulnerabilities, and help prioritize risks.
This makes it valuable for compliance and governance, as organizations can
ensure they understand their exposure and adhere to standards. Claroty
also supports anomaly detection to alert on possible threats, but like
Armis, its typical response mode is advisory: it generates alerts
or risk scores for analysts to act upon. Direct enforcement (blocking
threats or changing device states) generally requires integration with
other security controls or manual action. In summary, Claroty is a
powerful visibility and management tool that excels in situational
awareness and compliance support[20]. PacketViper, by contrast, combines visibility with active
defense – whereas Claroty might tell you what is wrong and guide
policy, PacketViper will automatically take action to stop an
attack. Many organizations may even use the two in tandem: Claroty as the
“brain” for OT asset intelligence, and PacketViper as the “immune system”
providing autonomous, real-time protection[21] .
Where PacketViper truly stands out is in its combination of
capabilities that few others offer together. Key differentiators of
PacketViper’s CPS protection include:
Fully Autonomous Threat Remediation:
PacketViper is built to automatically neutralize threats in real time
without human intervention or external orchestration. As soon as malicious
activity is detected (for example, an unexpected device scan or a
suspicious connection attempt), PacketViper’s in-line enforcement kicks in
to block or deceive the threat within milliseconds[3] . This agentless, wire-speed containment drastically reduces dwell
time. Competing solutions often generate an alert for a SOC to handle,
whereas PacketViper closes the loop by instantly removing the threat’s
access. This autonomy is critical in OT settings where attacks can
propagate faster than a human can respond.
360° Visibility with AlertBox Analytics:
PacketViper provides comprehensive visibility into both network and
physical dimensions of the CPS environment. Its AlertBox platform
(integrated with Microsoft Power BI) delivers rich dashboards and
telemetry analytics that give operators a full picture of their
cyber-physical state[19] . Users can see everything from device communication patterns and
port usage to environmental sensor status – all in one pane of glass. This
full-spectrum visibility is not just for monitoring; PacketViper’s
analytics also highlight compliance metrics and behavioral baselines,
making it easier to detect anomalies. In essence, PacketViper not only
stops attacks, but also helps teams understand what “normal” looks like in
their CPS network. The Power BI-driven AlertBox dashboards enable
interactive exploration of data and seamless reporting for both technical
teams and management stakeholders.
Self-Healing Configurations & Adaptive Decoys: The platform employs a highly dynamic defense model. PacketViper
uses adaptive decoy strategies – it continually rotates and
randomizes the deceptive assets (fake servers, sensors, PLCs, etc.) it
presents to adversaries[22]. This moving target defense confuses attackers by never giving
them a stable target. At the same time, PacketViper’s system
configurations are self-healing and automated. If a policy change
is needed (e.g. blocking a newly discovered malicious IP or segmenting a
subnet after an incident), PacketViper propagates these updates across its
distributed units instantly. No manual reconfiguration or external orchestrator
is required[22] . The result is a resilient security posture that adjusts itself
on the fly – decoys shuffle, blacklist rules propagate enterprise-wide,
and even if an attacker disables one sensor, others immediately
compensate. This orchestration-free adaptiveness is a unique advantage in
keeping up with fast-moving threats.
Broad Compliance Coverage: PacketViper
was designed with regulatory and framework alignment in mind, serving as a
technical control to satisfy many security requirements in critical
infrastructure. The system comes with built-in compensating controls
and reporting mapped to about 20 different security standards and
regulations[23]. For example, it can help meet NERC CIP directives for electric
utilities by providing network segmentation and unauthorized access
detection, or assist with NIST 800-53 controls through its monitoring and
automated response capabilities. PacketViper’s comprehensive approach
(covering aspects of asset management, access control, threat
detection/response, and incident reporting) means it can fill gaps where
legacy systems fall short. Organizations can use PacketViper to
demonstrate compliance with standards like NIST CSF, ISO 27001, NERC-CIP,
ISA/IEC 62443, HIPAA, and others via its audits and logs[23] . Few solutions offer this breadth of control functions
out-of-the-box – PacketViper effectively acts as a compensating control
layer that bolsters security governance without needing dozens of point
products.
Taken together, these capabilities make PacketViper a holistic CPS
protection platform. It not only detects and blocks threats autonomously,
but also provides the visibility, adaptability, and compliance-ready controls
that complex OT environments demand[24] . PacketViper’s ability to serve as “one platform to do it all”
(visibility, deception, enforcement, and audit) is a key differentiator in a
market where many tools specialize in just one area.
PacketViper’s cyber-physical approach is versatile and has been applied
across numerous critical infrastructure sectors. A few example use cases
include:
Smart Traffic Control Systems: Modern
city traffic management is a classic CPS domain – networks of sensors and
lights interact to direct physical flows of vehicles. These systems are
often distributed across intersections and roadside units, making them
challenging to secure. PacketViper can be deployed to protect municipal
traffic control networks by segmenting control devices and deploying
decoys that lure away would-be hackers. For instance, a PacketViper unit
installed in a traffic control cabinet can monitor all incoming connections
and fake additional traffic controller endpoints to confuse attackers. Any
unauthorized attempt to send commands to traffic lights can be detected
and blocked autonomously, preventing chaos on the roads. As cities
implement connected intersections and IoT sensors to optimize traffic
flow, ensuring those CPS are safe from cyber interference is paramount[9] . PacketViper provides a solution that keeps the traffic system’s
digital infrastructure secure without requiring constant manual oversight.
Building Automation Systems (Smart Buildings): In large office buildings, hospitals, or campuses, building
management systems control HVAC, elevators, security cameras, and badge
access – all physical processes increasingly connected to IT networks.
PacketViper can give 360° visibility and protection in these
environments by monitoring both the network traffic between building
control devices and the physical environmental conditions. For example, in
a high-rise’s automation closet, PacketViper could integrate with motion
sensors and door access controls (to detect physical tampering) while
simultaneously enforcing network policies (to block a rogue device plugged
into the building LAN). If an attacker tried to access a building’s HVAC
controller over the network, they would be met with deceptive decoy
devices and automatically blacklisted. Because building OT systems often
lack strong authentication and can be entry points into corporate
networks, PacketViper’s micro-segmentation and deception bring an
immediate security layer. Notably, building control systems involve many
embedded devices (boilers, chillers, alarm panels, etc.), which
PacketViper classifies as OT assets that need specialized protection[17] . By deploying PacketViper, facility operators can ensure safe,
continuous operations – the lights stay on and the climate controls
stay efficient, with cyber threats quietly thwarted in the background.
Power and Water Utilities: Critical
utilities like electric power grids and water treatment facilities rely on
CPS to run generation, distribution, and treatment processes. PacketViper
has been used in these settings to safeguard SCADA and PLC systems that
manage the physical equipment. For instance, in a power substation
PacketViper can enforce strict network whitelists so that only known
control centers can communicate with relay controllers – any other traffic
would hit a deceptive trap or be dropped. Likewise, in water treatment
plants, PacketViper’s decoys can mimic pumping station controllers to
detect illicit scanning or command attempts, and then instantly block the
source[25]. A real-world example is deploying PacketViper in a municipal
water facility: the system was able to detect anomalous Modbus commands
targeting pumps, trigger real-time alerts, and even reduce incident
response times from hours to minutes by automatically isolating the threat[26] . These capabilities also help utility operators meet regulatory
requirements (such as NERC CIP for electric utilities or EPA guidelines
for water systems) by providing an active compensating control that
watches over remote sites. Overall, PacketViper adds a critical layer of
defense to utility infrastructure – ensuring that attempts to physically
sabotage the grid or water supply via cyber means are immediately
contained.
Remote Unattended Sites: Many sectors
have remote, unmanned locations – oil & gas pipelines, electric grid
substations, rail switching facilities, etc. – which are often air-gapped
or on minimal networks. These are notoriously difficult to secure due to
lack of onsite personnel and limited connectivity. PacketViper is
well-suited to such scenarios: its Remote Security Units can be dropped
into far-flung sites to provide autonomous, local protection. Consider a
pipeline pumping station in a rural area: PacketViper would continuously
watch the small control network at that site, logging all device
communications and detecting any abnormal device (say, a laptop plugged in
by a third-party technician or an attacker who breached the fence). If
anything out of policy occurs, PacketViper can immediately lock down that
connection – effectively **“freeze” the threat in place – while alerting
central operations[27]. This stops an intruder from pivoting into the wider network or
interfering with the process. Meanwhile, all of this happens without
needing reliable internet connectivity; PacketViper doesn’t need cloud
access or human input to take action. For organizations managing hundreds
of remote outposts (e.g. electric utilities with substations or
transportation agencies with remote signaling equipment), this capability
is a game-changer. It provides peace of mind that each site is actively
defended, closing the security gap that previously existed at unmanned
critical locations[28][29] .
Cyber-physical systems demand a security approach that is as integrated
and responsive as the systems themselves. PacketViper’s solution embodies
this by uniting physical sensor monitoring, network deception, and autonomous
enforcement into one platform. The CPS landscape is expanding rapidly –
fueled by smart industry and infrastructure – and with it comes a rising
responsibility to manage cyber-physical risks. PacketViper uniquely addresses
this challenge, delivering 360° protection that resonates with both
technical teams (who value the real-time, automated defense and deep analytics)
and security decision-makers (who see improved compliance, reduced incident
impact, and tangible risk reduction). By surpassing traditional OT security
tools in its proactive capabilities, PacketViper positions itself as a
comprehensive guardian for the next generation of connected infrastructure[24] . Whether it’s a remote substation, a factory floor, or a city’s
traffic grid, PacketViper provides the confidence that the digital and physical
components of operations are safe – automatically detecting, deceiving, and
defeating threats before they can disrupt the real world.
Sources:
1. PacketViper vs Claroty CPS
Comparative Analysis
2. Grandview Research –
Cyber-Physical Systems Market Trends (2025)
3. PacketViper Internal Whitepaper
(Modbus Integration & Critical Infrastructure)
4. Forescout – Difference Between CPS
and IoT (Feb 2025)
5. Siemens SIBERprotect Announcement
(April 2024)
6. Honeywell OT Cybersecurity FAQ
7. Armis Platform Overview – OT
Security
8. PacketViper AlertBox &
Autonomous Enforcement Overview
9. PacketViper Use Case – Remote
Sites & Third-Party Access
10. Industry Incident Reports – Colonial Pipeline & Oldsmar Water
Attack
[7] [8] [9] Cyber-physical Systems Market Size| Industry Report, 2030
A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Leading Operational Technology
Security Platforms: The Strategic Case for Preemptive Cyber Defense
[13] Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) vs IoT: What's the Difference?
[14] [15] [16] Siemens SIBERprotect Cyber Response Solution for Industrial OT Systems
| SecurityInfoWatch
[17] Honeywell OT Cybersecurity Solutions: Helps Protect What Matters
PacketViper White Papers
PacketViper Water Treatment plant case study and use case
Related Articles
Aligning Electric Utilities with NERC CIP-015-1 Through Preemptive Cyber Defense
Expert Report: Aligning Electric Utilities with NERC CIP-015-1 Through Preemptive Cyber Defense Executive Summary: Bridging the NERC CIP-015-1 Gap with Preemptive Cyber Defense Electric utilities across North America operate within an increasingly ...
Enhancing Operational Technology (OT) Security with PacketViper's MODBUS Integration
White Paper: Enhancing Operational Technology (OT) Security with PacketViper's MODBUS Integration Abstract Operational Technology (OT) environments, critical to industries such as manufacturing, energy, and utilities, are increasingly vulnerable to ...
PacketViper - Cyber-Physical System (CPS) Comparative Analysis
Overview PacketViper’s analytics and visualization are powered by an AlertBox platform, providing advanced telemetry, behavioral analytics, and compliance visibility. With these capabilities, PacketViper’s autonomous enforcement model eliminates the ...
Enhancing Operational Technology (OT) Security with PacketViper's MODBUS Integration
Abstract Operational Technology (OT) environments, critical to industries such as manufacturing, energy, and utilities, are increasingly vulnerable to sophisticated cyberattacks. While OT systems were designed for reliability and uptime, they often ...
A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Leading Operational Technology Security Platforms: The Strategic Case for Preemptive Cyber Defense
The Strategic Case for Preemptive Cyber Defense Audio File: Beyond the Air Gap: Deception and Autonomous Defense for Critical Infrastructure Executive Summary: A Strategic Guide to a Fragmented Market The Operational Technology (OT) security market ...