PacketViper’s Cyber-Physical Security Capabilities Whitepaper

PacketViper’s Cyber-Physical Security Capabilities Whitepaper

PacketViper’s Cyber-Physical Security Capabilities Whitepaper

PacketViper’s Integrated Approach to Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS)

PacketViper takes an integrated approach to CPS security by bridging physical and digital domains under one autonomous system. It monitors physical access and environmental factors (e.g. motion, temperature, humidity) via integrated sensors, feeding this data into its security platform for 360° visibility[1]. Anomalies in the physical environment (such as unauthorized door openings or abnormal room temperature) can be correlated with network events in real time, providing comprehensive situational awareness. This tight cyber-physical correlation means that PacketViper can detect and respond to threats faster – for example, a tripped motion sensor in a server closet combined with unusual network scans will trigger instant alerts and defensive actions[2]
.

On the cyber side, PacketViper autonomously controls digital network access through in-line deception and automated enforcement. It deploys active decoys and micro-perimeter segmentation at critical points to contain threats immediately without waiting for human intervention or complex orchestration[3][4]. Suspicious traffic (e.g. malware or an unauthorized device) is automatically engaged by PacketViper’s decoys and then blocked in real time – effectively neutralizing attacks at “wire speed.” This autonomous threat remediation is built into the platform’s design, allowing it to isolate and stop malicious activity on OT networks while legitimate operations continue unaffected[3]. By enforcing Zero Trust principles (only allowing expected communications and nothing else), PacketViper prevents lateral movement, even for stealthy threats that breach the perimeter[4]
.

Critically, PacketViper is designed to operate in distributed, unmanaged, or air-gapped locations typical of CPS environments. Its architecture distributes intelligence out to Remote Security Units (RSUs) that can function independently at remote sites such as traffic control cabinets, building automation closets, or far-flung utility stations. Each unit provides local monitoring and defense without requiring constant connectivity to a central hub[5]. This means PacketViper can secure unattended infrastructure – maintaining segmented, secure communications even in air-gapped or isolated networks[6]
. The platform’s orchestration-free autonomy is ideal for critical systems in remote or rugged locations: for example, a PacketViper appliance in a highway traffic controller or pipeline pump station will continue enforcing policy and deploying decoys on-site, even if the backhaul network is down. In short, PacketViper integrates physical sensor data, cyber deception, and self-contained enforcement to protect CPS in real time, wherever they are deployed.

Cyber-Physical Systems Market Overview

The Cyber-Physical Systems market is large and rapidly growing, reflecting the convergence of operational technology with IT. In 2024, the global CPS market is estimated around \$118 billion, with analysts projecting robust double-digit growth (~13–15% CAGR) in the coming years[7]
. This growth is driven by several key factors:

  • Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing: The push for automation and data-driven operations in industry (Industry 4.0) is a major catalyst for CPS adoption[8]
    . Manufacturers are deploying CPS to enable real-time coordination between machines and digital systems, improving efficiency and enabling predictive maintenance and autonomous production lines. These “smart factory” initiatives rely on CPS technologies to tightly integrate sensors, robotics, and control systems on the shop floor.
  • Smart Infrastructure & Cities: Governments and enterprises are investing heavily in smart infrastructure (smart grids, intelligent transportation systems, smart buildings, etc.), which in turn drives the CPS market[9]. Urban initiatives use CPS to link digital intelligence with physical infrastructure – for example, optimizing traffic flow through connected traffic lights, reducing energy waste in power grids, and automating building climate or security controls. The rise of these projects around the world is expanding CPS deployment in transportation, utilities, and city services[9]
    .
  • Rising Cyber-Physical Risks: As more critical processes become digitized and connected, there is greater awareness of the cyber-physical risk – the potential for cyber attacks to cause real-world physical disruption or safety incidents. High-profile events in recent years have underscored this danger: for instance, the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack in 2021 forced a shutdown of fuel distribution, and the Oldsmar water treatment breach showed an attacker attempting to alter chemical controls[10][11]. These incidents highlight that cyber threats can quickly translate into physical consequences. In response, regulators and industry standards are pressuring organizations to bolster CPS security. Frameworks like NERC CIP (for electric utilities) and new guidelines from agencies like CISA specifically call for internal segmentation and protections to address these cyber-physical threats[12]
    . The result is that security for CPS and industrial control systems has become a board-level priority in many sectors.

CPS vs IoT – Closed-Loop Control: It’s important to distinguish true Cyber-Physical Systems from the broader Internet of Things (IoT). While IoT generally refers to networks of connected devices exchanging data (often for monitoring or convenience), CPS are characterized by real-time, closed-loop control of physical processes[13]. In a CPS, embedded computers don’t just send data to the cloud – they actively monitor sensor readings and then adjust or control physical equipment based on that feedback. For example, an autonomous manufacturing cell or a self-driving car forms a CPS: sensors feed into algorithms that immediately drive actuators. IoT devices (like a smart thermostat or a wearable sensor) typically lack this direct automated control loop. This distinction matters for security. Protecting CPS means safeguarding systems that could autonomously change the physical world – failures can have safety implications. Thus, CPS security demands not only network protection, but assurance that feedback loops cannot be maliciously manipulated. PacketViper’s approach, with its focus on both the physical signals and digital commands, is tailored for this reality, whereas many IoT security tools may only address device connectivity and data concerns[13]
.

Comparison with Other CPS Protection Solutions

In the emerging CPS protection space, several vendors offer solutions that address parts of the problem. Below is a brief comparison of PacketViper with a few notable players, highlighting differing philosophies and capabilities:

  • Siemens (SIBERprotect): Siemens’s SIBERprotect is a PLC-based real-time cyber-physical defense system. It extends the concept of SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, Response) into industrial control by sending alerts directly to a PLC for instant protective action[14]. In practice, SIBERprotect can isolate and quarantine infected industrial equipment within milliseconds of a threat being detected[15]. This rapid response at the automation layer (using S7-1500 PLC controllers) allows it to contain malware or attacks before they spread, effectively acting as a “cyber safety system” tied into the control hardware. SIBERprotect’s strength is leveraging Siemens’ deep integration with control systems to initiate physical responses (e.g. shutting down a process or switching networks) immediately based on threat intelligence. It excels at real-time containment in environments that use Siemens gear, though its focus is on automatic isolation of incidents rather than deceptive prevention. Siemens positions SIBERprotect as part of a defense-in-depth strategy compliant with IEC‑62443 standards for industrial cybersecurity[16]
    .
  • Honeywell: Honeywell, as a leading industrial automation vendor, provides OT cybersecurity solutions that emphasize protecting the physical process and operational continuity. Their approach leverages deep domain expertise in industries like energy, chemicals, and manufacturing. Honeywell’s solutions (e.g. Honeywell Forge Cybersecurity and various services) focus on real-time OT network visibility, anomaly detection, and safety integration[17]. They highlight the need to monitor industrial process variables alongside traditional cyber indicators to detect cyber-physical attack phases. For example, Honeywell’s systems can observe if a process setpoint is suddenly changed outside normal parameters, correlating that with network alerts to catch an attack in progress. Honeywell also offers secured USB media scanning (SMX) and OT-focused security operations centers, reflecting a holistic approach to reducing operational risk[17]
    . In short, Honeywell’s strength lies in marrying cybersecurity with process safety – providing governance, compliance, and managed services that help protect the actual physical operations of industrial sites. Their offerings are often service-heavy and integrated with Honeywell control systems, aimed at organizations that need to improve OT security posture without compromising reliability.
  • Armis: Armis delivers an agentless, real-time visibility platform widely used for enterprise IoT and OT environments. In the CPS context, Armis acts as a passive monitoring system that discovers every device on the network and continuously watches for anomalous behavior or threats[18]. It is cloud-based and aggregates data to detect things like unauthorized devices, strange traffic patterns, or known attack signatures in real time. Armis is especially known for its extensive device knowledgebase (covering IT, IoT, and industrial devices) and its ability to identify assets and risks without installing any software on endpoints. When it comes to enforcement, Armis typically integrates with existing network infrastructure (such as NAC solutions or firewalls) to quarantine or segment devices as needed. Its core value is CPS threat detection and visibility – giving security teams a live map of everything happening in their OT network and alerting on suspicious events[18]
    . Compared to PacketViper, Armis provides rich detection and asset intelligence, but it relies on alerting and integrated partner tools for response (often a human or separate system must take action on Armis alerts). In essence, Armis excels at painting a detailed picture of the CPS environment and spotting threats, whereas PacketViper goes further by automatically defending in-line once a threat is spotted.
  • Claroty: Claroty is often cited as a leading platform for OT asset governance, risk management, and visibility. Its flagship products focus on deep asset discovery (inventories of PLCs, RTUs, etc.), continuous network monitoring, vulnerability assessment, and simplified secure remote access to OT systems[19]. Claroty’s strength lies in providing a comprehensive view of all OT assets and their communications – it can map out network connections, identify misconfigurations or vulnerabilities, and help prioritize risks. This makes it valuable for compliance and governance, as organizations can ensure they understand their exposure and adhere to standards. Claroty also supports anomaly detection to alert on possible threats, but like Armis, its typical response mode is advisory: it generates alerts or risk scores for analysts to act upon. Direct enforcement (blocking threats or changing device states) generally requires integration with other security controls or manual action. In summary, Claroty is a powerful visibility and management tool that excels in situational awareness and compliance support[20]. PacketViper, by contrast, combines visibility with active defense – whereas Claroty might tell you what is wrong and guide policy, PacketViper will automatically take action to stop an attack. Many organizations may even use the two in tandem: Claroty as the “brain” for OT asset intelligence, and PacketViper as the “immune system” providing autonomous, real-time protection[21]
    .

PacketViper’s Unique Advantages in CPS Security

Where PacketViper truly stands out is in its combination of capabilities that few others offer together. Key differentiators of PacketViper’s CPS protection include:

  • Fully Autonomous Threat Remediation: PacketViper is built to automatically neutralize threats in real time without human intervention or external orchestration. As soon as malicious activity is detected (for example, an unexpected device scan or a suspicious connection attempt), PacketViper’s in-line enforcement kicks in to block or deceive the threat within milliseconds[3]
    . This agentless, wire-speed containment drastically reduces dwell time. Competing solutions often generate an alert for a SOC to handle, whereas PacketViper closes the loop by instantly removing the threat’s access. This autonomy is critical in OT settings where attacks can propagate faster than a human can respond.
  • 360° Visibility with AlertBox Analytics: PacketViper provides comprehensive visibility into both network and physical dimensions of the CPS environment. Its AlertBox platform (integrated with Microsoft Power BI) delivers rich dashboards and telemetry analytics that give operators a full picture of their cyber-physical state[19]
    . Users can see everything from device communication patterns and port usage to environmental sensor status – all in one pane of glass. This full-spectrum visibility is not just for monitoring; PacketViper’s analytics also highlight compliance metrics and behavioral baselines, making it easier to detect anomalies. In essence, PacketViper not only stops attacks, but also helps teams understand what “normal” looks like in their CPS network. The Power BI-driven AlertBox dashboards enable interactive exploration of data and seamless reporting for both technical teams and management stakeholders.
  • Self-Healing Configurations & Adaptive Decoys: The platform employs a highly dynamic defense model. PacketViper uses adaptive decoy strategies – it continually rotates and randomizes the deceptive assets (fake servers, sensors, PLCs, etc.) it presents to adversaries[22]. This moving target defense confuses attackers by never giving them a stable target. At the same time, PacketViper’s system configurations are self-healing and automated. If a policy change is needed (e.g. blocking a newly discovered malicious IP or segmenting a subnet after an incident), PacketViper propagates these updates across its distributed units instantly. No manual reconfiguration or external orchestrator is required[22]
    . The result is a resilient security posture that adjusts itself on the fly – decoys shuffle, blacklist rules propagate enterprise-wide, and even if an attacker disables one sensor, others immediately compensate. This orchestration-free adaptiveness is a unique advantage in keeping up with fast-moving threats.
  • Broad Compliance Coverage: PacketViper was designed with regulatory and framework alignment in mind, serving as a technical control to satisfy many security requirements in critical infrastructure. The system comes with built-in compensating controls and reporting mapped to about 20 different security standards and regulations[23]. For example, it can help meet NERC CIP directives for electric utilities by providing network segmentation and unauthorized access detection, or assist with NIST 800-53 controls through its monitoring and automated response capabilities. PacketViper’s comprehensive approach (covering aspects of asset management, access control, threat detection/response, and incident reporting) means it can fill gaps where legacy systems fall short. Organizations can use PacketViper to demonstrate compliance with standards like NIST CSF, ISO 27001, NERC-CIP, ISA/IEC 62443, HIPAA, and others via its audits and logs[23]
    . Few solutions offer this breadth of control functions out-of-the-box – PacketViper effectively acts as a compensating control layer that bolsters security governance without needing dozens of point products.

Taken together, these capabilities make PacketViper a holistic CPS protection platform. It not only detects and blocks threats autonomously, but also provides the visibility, adaptability, and compliance-ready controls that complex OT environments demand[24]
. PacketViper’s ability to serve as “one platform to do it all” (visibility, deception, enforcement, and audit) is a key differentiator in a market where many tools specialize in just one area.

Use Cases Across Critical Infrastructure

PacketViper’s cyber-physical approach is versatile and has been applied across numerous critical infrastructure sectors. A few example use cases include:

  • Smart Traffic Control Systems: Modern city traffic management is a classic CPS domain – networks of sensors and lights interact to direct physical flows of vehicles. These systems are often distributed across intersections and roadside units, making them challenging to secure. PacketViper can be deployed to protect municipal traffic control networks by segmenting control devices and deploying decoys that lure away would-be hackers. For instance, a PacketViper unit installed in a traffic control cabinet can monitor all incoming connections and fake additional traffic controller endpoints to confuse attackers. Any unauthorized attempt to send commands to traffic lights can be detected and blocked autonomously, preventing chaos on the roads. As cities implement connected intersections and IoT sensors to optimize traffic flow, ensuring those CPS are safe from cyber interference is paramount[9]
    . PacketViper provides a solution that keeps the traffic system’s digital infrastructure secure without requiring constant manual oversight.
  • Building Automation Systems (Smart Buildings): In large office buildings, hospitals, or campuses, building management systems control HVAC, elevators, security cameras, and badge access – all physical processes increasingly connected to IT networks. PacketViper can give 360° visibility and protection in these environments by monitoring both the network traffic between building control devices and the physical environmental conditions. For example, in a high-rise’s automation closet, PacketViper could integrate with motion sensors and door access controls (to detect physical tampering) while simultaneously enforcing network policies (to block a rogue device plugged into the building LAN). If an attacker tried to access a building’s HVAC controller over the network, they would be met with deceptive decoy devices and automatically blacklisted. Because building OT systems often lack strong authentication and can be entry points into corporate networks, PacketViper’s micro-segmentation and deception bring an immediate security layer. Notably, building control systems involve many embedded devices (boilers, chillers, alarm panels, etc.), which PacketViper classifies as OT assets that need specialized protection[17]
    . By deploying PacketViper, facility operators can ensure safe, continuous operations – the lights stay on and the climate controls stay efficient, with cyber threats quietly thwarted in the background.
  • Power and Water Utilities: Critical utilities like electric power grids and water treatment facilities rely on CPS to run generation, distribution, and treatment processes. PacketViper has been used in these settings to safeguard SCADA and PLC systems that manage the physical equipment. For instance, in a power substation PacketViper can enforce strict network whitelists so that only known control centers can communicate with relay controllers – any other traffic would hit a deceptive trap or be dropped. Likewise, in water treatment plants, PacketViper’s decoys can mimic pumping station controllers to detect illicit scanning or command attempts, and then instantly block the source[25]. A real-world example is deploying PacketViper in a municipal water facility: the system was able to detect anomalous Modbus commands targeting pumps, trigger real-time alerts, and even reduce incident response times from hours to minutes by automatically isolating the threat[26]
    . These capabilities also help utility operators meet regulatory requirements (such as NERC CIP for electric utilities or EPA guidelines for water systems) by providing an active compensating control that watches over remote sites. Overall, PacketViper adds a critical layer of defense to utility infrastructure – ensuring that attempts to physically sabotage the grid or water supply via cyber means are immediately contained.
  • Remote Unattended Sites: Many sectors have remote, unmanned locations – oil & gas pipelines, electric grid substations, rail switching facilities, etc. – which are often air-gapped or on minimal networks. These are notoriously difficult to secure due to lack of onsite personnel and limited connectivity. PacketViper is well-suited to such scenarios: its Remote Security Units can be dropped into far-flung sites to provide autonomous, local protection. Consider a pipeline pumping station in a rural area: PacketViper would continuously watch the small control network at that site, logging all device communications and detecting any abnormal device (say, a laptop plugged in by a third-party technician or an attacker who breached the fence). If anything out of policy occurs, PacketViper can immediately lock down that connection – effectively **“freeze” the threat in place – while alerting central operations[27]. This stops an intruder from pivoting into the wider network or interfering with the process. Meanwhile, all of this happens without needing reliable internet connectivity; PacketViper doesn’t need cloud access or human input to take action. For organizations managing hundreds of remote outposts (e.g. electric utilities with substations or transportation agencies with remote signaling equipment), this capability is a game-changer. It provides peace of mind that each site is actively defended, closing the security gap that previously existed at unmanned critical locations[28][29]
    .

Conclusion

Cyber-physical systems demand a security approach that is as integrated and responsive as the systems themselves. PacketViper’s solution embodies this by uniting physical sensor monitoring, network deception, and autonomous enforcement into one platform. The CPS landscape is expanding rapidly – fueled by smart industry and infrastructure – and with it comes a rising responsibility to manage cyber-physical risks. PacketViper uniquely addresses this challenge, delivering 360° protection that resonates with both technical teams (who value the real-time, automated defense and deep analytics) and security decision-makers (who see improved compliance, reduced incident impact, and tangible risk reduction). By surpassing traditional OT security tools in its proactive capabilities, PacketViper positions itself as a comprehensive guardian for the next generation of connected infrastructure[24]
. Whether it’s a remote substation, a factory floor, or a city’s traffic grid, PacketViper provides the confidence that the digital and physical components of operations are safe – automatically detecting, deceiving, and defeating threats before they can disrupt the real world.


 

Sources:

1.     PacketViper vs Claroty CPS Comparative Analysis

2.     Grandview Research – Cyber-Physical Systems Market Trends (2025)

3.     PacketViper Internal Whitepaper (Modbus Integration & Critical Infrastructure)

4.     Forescout – Difference Between CPS and IoT (Feb 2025)

5.     Siemens SIBERprotect Announcement (April 2024)

6.     Honeywell OT Cybersecurity FAQ

7.     Armis Platform Overview – OT Security

8.     PacketViper AlertBox & Autonomous Enforcement Overview

9.     PacketViper Use Case – Remote Sites & Third-Party Access

10. Industry Incident Reports – Colonial Pipeline & Oldsmar Water Attack


[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [30] Physical System (CPS) Comparative Analysis

[7] [8] [9] Cyber-physical Systems Market Size| Industry Report, 2030

A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Leading Operational Technology Security Platforms: The Strategic Case for Preemptive Cyber Defense

[13] Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) vs IoT: What's the Difference?

[14] [15] [16] Siemens SIBERprotect Cyber Response Solution for Industrial OT Systems | SecurityInfoWatch

[17] Honeywell OT Cybersecurity Solutions: Helps Protect What Matters

PacketViper White Papers

PacketViper Water Treatment plant case study and use case